Hi, I am a designer and a stumpwm fan. I couldn't keep myself from drafting an alternative when I saw the logo discussion. So, how about one of these:
http://kenanb.com/static/img/stumpwm.png 2014-01-31 <stumpwm-devel-requ...@nongnu.org>: > Send Stumpwm-devel mailing list submissions to > stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > stumpwm-devel-requ...@nongnu.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > stumpwm-devel-ow...@nongnu.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Stumpwm-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. New Logo Survey (David Bjergaard) > 2. Re: New Logo Survey (Alex Kost) > 3. Re: Revitalizing StumpWM (Michael Filonenko) > 4. Re: New Logo Survey (David Bjergaard) > 5. Re: New Logo Survey (Pedro Insua) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500 > From: David Bjergaard <dbjerga...@gmail.com> > To: stumpwm-devel <stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org> > Subject: [STUMP] New Logo Survey > Message-ID: <878utxz6h0....@phy.duke.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi All, > > The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump > four > years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a > google form where you can vote for your favorite: > > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform > > In a week I'll announce the winner. As said on the form, and on the > wiki: > > For any of the logos [...], minor changes would be needed to really use > them as a logo. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > [1] https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:45:57 +0400 > From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> > To: stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey > Message-ID: <878utwbku2....@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > > David Bjergaard (2014-01-30 22:10 +0400) wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump > four > > years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a > > google form where you can vote for your favorite: > > > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform > > I drew an SVG of my variant of logo. I hope it's not too late to > participate in the competition :) > > The logo can be found in the bottom of > <https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo> or at > <https://github.com/alezost/stumpwm-logo>. > > -- > All the best, Alex > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:01:05 +0400 > From: Michael Filonenko <filonenko.mikh...@gmail.com> > To: 38a93...@rambler.ru > Cc: e...@ericabrahamsen.net, StumpWM-devel <stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org> > Subject: Re: [STUMP] Revitalizing StumpWM > Message-ID: > <CACdxn72TcyrK=u7=kfERt+BgpaLZgCVh8Lru= > 4phtrdyglm...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi all. > > clx-truetype performance leaks are bitmap caching at client side, instead > of server side and kerning. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Michael Raskin <38a93...@rambler.ru > >wrote: > > > >Michael Raskin <38a93...@rambler.ru> writes: > > > > > >>>> 3. Text drawing is slower with this fork, especially when some > > character > > >>>> is drawn after it is purged from cache as too old. As far as > > >>>> I understand this doesn't affect fixed fonts, but it is something to > > >>>> document? > > >>>Can you explain point 3? I'm happy to merge this with the core, I > just > > >>>want to understand exactly what you mean. I'm actually using this > > >>>version on one of my computers now. > > >> > > >> I have a custom command (listing all tags of all windows) that > produces > > >> a lot of text. If I run it twice, second run is almost always > > >> instantaneous. But sometimes the first run of that command takes a few > > >> seconds. Under adverse conditions it can even take ten seconds to draw > > >> the message. > > >If I'm following, users of bitmap fonts won't see a difference, but if > > >you choose to render truetype (TT) fonts then you may see a delay if > stump > > >tries to dump a lot of text on screen? > > > > I didn't test it well, but apparently fixed font works fine. > > > > >The takeaway is: > > >1. If this is reintegrated, users will get the same old > > > performance "out of the box" > > >2. If you choose to use TT fonts, you may see performance impacts when > > > dumping large chunks of text to the screen > > > > > >Michael, are you aware of why this is the case? Is it an issue that can > > >be fixed in StumpWM, or is it in the TT rendering library? It would be > > >helpful to have an example command that just dumped a grid of characters > > >so that we could ensure that there isn't something funky going on > > >elsewhere. > > > > I feel it is a problem with clx-truetype, but I am not completely sure. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > > > > > > -- > With best regards, Michael Filonenko > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/stumpwm-devel/attachments/20140131/ca1c919b/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:18:02 -0500 > From: David Bjergaard <dbjerga...@gmail.com> > To: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> > Cc: stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey > Message-ID: <871tzogoyd....@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi all, > > I've added Alex's logo as an option. Since his logo was a late edition > I've split the responses into a new file. > > *Note* If you have already voted, you may vote again for Alex's logo if > you want to. > > In the event of a tie between the new and old responses, we'll have a > tiebreaker between the two tied logos. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes: > > > David Bjergaard (2014-01-30 22:10 +0400) wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump > four > >> years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a > >> google form where you can vote for your favorite: > >> > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform > > > > I drew an SVG of my variant of logo. I hope it's not too late to > > participate in the competition :) > > > > The logo can be found in the bottom of > > <https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo> or at > > <https://github.com/alezost/stumpwm-logo>. > > > > -- > > All the best, Alex > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:40:53 +0100 > From: Pedro Insua <pedroin...@gmail.com> > To: stumpwm-devel <stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org> > Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey > Message-ID: <874n4km7e2.wl%pedroin...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500, > David Bjergaard wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump > four > > years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a > > google form where you can vote for your favorite: > > > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform > > Could you put 'none' to be a choice? My minimalistic mind doesn't like > any logo.. > > > (sorry.. my english is really bad..) > > > > > In a week I'll announce the winner. As said on the form, and on the > > wiki: > > > > For any of the logos [...], minor changes would be needed to really use > > them as a logo. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave > > > > [1] https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > > > End of Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12 > ********************************************** >
_______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
