> >So just to be clear: we should totally use ASDF, and using ASDF is >enough for quicklisp. I think quicklisp is a good thing, and I think >that all or most of the *current* hard core stump users are also >quicklisp users. That's great. I just want to make sure that when we >design the workflow for installing contrib modules we have something >that makes sense for users who aren't necessarily like us. > >(I think the emacs analogy is decent. And to be fair, I compile emacs >myself, from sources but I don't expect that other people will do the >same.)
May I ask a simple question? Can't we build QuickLisp into the StumpWM binary for novice users? _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
