Hi David, Thanks for feedback and pointers to the code, however I would not expect to be able to code it as my lisp skills are abysmal. I suppose it's more realistic as a feature request for the stumpwm rewrite you mention (i was unaware of this, but then again have not been keeping up-to-date with the list lately).
/Johnny David Bjergaard <dbjerga...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > This is technically possible, but would require some non-trivial amount of > hacking. Since stumpwm has its own custom GUI code, you would have to roll > your > own version that does what you propose in an X-window. You probably want to > start with the code that draws the dialog for "windowlist", aka, > select-window-from-menu. The issue is that a lot of these allow the user to > redefine them so they have format strings that will modify their behavior. It > may make hacking the code more difficult. > > If you've got the lisp chops to do this, please feel free to implement it as a > module. This would be very useful! If not, then I think this is a great idea > for paulownia, the modern stumpwm re-write. > > David > > <yggdra...@gmx.co.uk> writes: > >> I am wondering if there is any way, or opinion on the idea, to 'tile' >> groups much like frames can be tiled. I occasionally find myself working >> with multiple projects at once, and for each project I like to have >> various applications/views with different groups, so stacking the projects >> vertically and each projects applications horizontally would provide >> great flexibility. >> >> Something like: >> >> |-----------+-----------+-------------+-----------+ >> | Group 1.1 | Group 1.2 | Group 1.3 | Group 1.4 | <- Project 1 >> |-----------+-----------+-------------+-----------+ >> | Group 2.1 | Group 2.2 | <Group 2.3> | Group 2.4 | <- Project 2 >> |-----------+-----------+-------------+-----------+ >> | Group 3.1 | Group 3.2 | Group 3.3 | Group 3.4 | <- Project 3 >> |-----------+-----------+-------------+-----------+ >> >> Where Group 2.3 is the current group and then 'gnext' would take me to >> 2.4 and 'gprev' to 2.2. Two new functions, e.g. 'gup' could instead go >> to 1.3 and 'gdown' to 3.3. >> >> I guess this is sort of a virtual wall of screens. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
