On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:00:19PM -0500, stumpwm-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
> > > making the project more future proof. > > > > That is very unfortunate, as I used CLISP. I guess I will continue > > using the latest supported version. > > > > I don't want you to think I'm trying to tell you what to do, but CLISP is > pretty much abandonware and hasn't had a release in about 7 years. > > Are there any particular reasons you can't use SBCL? > > Regards, > Elias Not sure if my email went out, due to network breaking on my side. CLISP has readline built-in, it is well documented and GNU project, similar like GCL (which I currently cannot compile). I do not miss myself any feature, that is very specific personal opinion, you may loose it. Matter is similar to choice of the shell, like zsh, bash, or something like that. I use CLISP often as main "shell" and working environment. Jean _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
