This is great! Reading your findings, I can't help but ask why further work on CLX is the chosen path forward. It seems that CLX is a one-off that should be retired in favor of an FFI-bindings solution.
Carlos David Bjergaard <davi...@duke.edu> writes: > Hi, > > As many of you know, one of the longstanding feature requests for StumpWM is > better support for international/non-english input. I have done a significant > amount of research on the topic and have discovered that the whole problem has > never been fully explained before (I'm sure some people more familiar with the > problem will correct me on this). In either case, I've written up my findings > here: > https://dbjergaard.github.io/posts/clx_extensions.html > > If anyone wants to contribute or knows of resources I've missed, please chime > in > and help! > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
