Hello,
Not particularly demanding on that matter,
but if it is slower, could that be an option in the conf file : LogReverseDNS=yes/no ?

Anyway, even in that case, there will be an extra charge to stunnel...

Regards
Pierre

Le 27/07/2013 02:28, Brian Wilkins a écrit :
It is slower because it would have to do a DNS lookup for every IP. Sure, it could be cached but its just informational.

On Friday, July 26, 2013, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

    The benefit would be the added convenience of seeing meaningful
    DNS names instead of numeric IPs for those that prefer this.  The
    added load on stunnel would be trivial for reverse dns lookups on
    separate process threads.

    -----------------
    What would be the benefit? It would slow stunnel down.
    On Jul 26, 2013 5:47 PM, "[email protected] <javascript:_e({},
    'cvml', '[email protected]');>" <[email protected]
    <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>> wrote:
    Thanks, I guess I could do the equivalent with a batch file; but,
    was really hoping for buitin support for this in stunnel.  It
    would be nice to see in the upcoming 5.00 release as an option.
    -----------------
    Don't know on windows, but did a little test with a script to get
    the hostnames. First did a test using you records, and then used
    my current stunnel.log
    script stlog.chk
    ==================
    grep -Eo '([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}' /var/log/stunnel.log | sort
    | uniq
    >stout
    echo "" >stout2
    for a in `cat stout` ; do
    echo -n $a " ">>stout2;
    host $a | awk '{print $5}' >>stout2;
    done
    The results of stout2 are
    127.0.0.1 localhost.
    173.194.74.108 qe-in-f108.1e100.net <http://qe-in-f108.1e100.net/>.
    173.194.74.109 qe-in-f109.1e100.net <http://qe-in-f109.1e100.net/>.
    192.168.128.201 3(NXDOMAIN)
    74.125.25.108 pa-in-f108.1e100.net <http://pa-in-f108.1e100.net/>.
    74.125.25.109 pa-in-f109.1e100.net <http://pa-in-f109.1e100.net/>.
    Probable would want to add some code to filter out private address.
    Final step would be to scan original log and add the name on

    _______________________________________________
    stunnel-users mailing list
    [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
    '[email protected]');>
    https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users



_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

Reply via email to