Hmmm... at first sight this sounds like exactly the scenario I was concerned about back when the change was made (but got no response).

https://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/2014-September/004765.html

Graham

----- Original Message ----- From: "Tuomas Silen" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Truncated responses with stunnel >= 5.05



On 07/11/14 08:48, Michal Trojnara wrote:
Tuomas Silen wrote:
LOG3[31153]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing

Could you please share your stunnel.conf and some debug logs?
I need all the logs generated by stunnel for the problematic connection.


Sure, the config and debug level log of both working and
non-working connection are available at
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/44c47b3893c3ebf45018

Also worth noting is that if the client uses Connection: keep-alive
(instead of Connection: close), the problem does not appear, possibly
because the connection isn't closed right away.

It also only seems to appear if the response body is large enough.

I'll see if I can come up with some minimal setup to reliably
reproduce it.

Best regards,

-Tuomas
_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users


_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

Reply via email to