On Thu, 2016-03-31 10:39:03 -0400, Carter Browne wrote: > [..] > > I didn't ask the reason why in this case - I have had instances where I > wanted the communication to be encrypted, but I count not go directly > from Host1 to Host3. If he can go directly from Host1 to Host3, then > your configuration is correct. However, in these days of firewalls, > network segmentation, etc. the direct path may not be available or > desired.
Carter, I was wondering if there is a reason for the two separately encrypted connections. I had the impression, an end-to-end-encryption and a port forwarder on Host2 was easier to set up (and more resource conserving), but this may be a matter of taste ... Ludolf -- Ludolf Holzheid Bihl+Wiedemann GmbH Floßwörthstraße 41 68199 Mannheim, Germany Tel: +49 621 33996-0 Fax: +49 621 3392239 mailto:[email protected] http://www.bihl-wiedemann.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Mannheim Geschäftsführer: Jochen Bihl, Bernhard Wiedemann Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 5796 _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
