Uri, Glad you found the issue. The new behaviour is safer from a security standpoint. Not sure if that's documented.
Regards, Jose > El 14/09/2016, a las 1:46 a.m., Ulli Horlacher > <[email protected]> escribió: > >> On Tue 2016-09-13 (22:25), Micha?? Trojnara wrote: >> On 13.09.2016 20:35, Ulli Horlacher wrote: >>>> It is impossible to say anything without analysis of the executed fexsrv >>>> program. >>> >>> The problem cannot be in fexsrv, because it works with stunnel 4.27 >> >> What is the point of sending an email to the mailing list when you >> ignore our effort to help you? > > Where do I ignore help? > > >> fexsrv terminates immediately with exit code 1. > > No. It does not start at all, so it does not terminate. > fexsrv logs everything and when running with stunnel 5.x the log file is > empty. > > But meanwhile I found the error: > > stunnel 5.x needs the a full path for the exec statement: > > exec = /usr/bin/perl > > For stunnel 4.x it was sufficent to use: > > exec = perl > > > -- > Ullrich Horlacher Server und Virtualisierung > Rechenzentrum TIK > Universitaet Stuttgart E-Mail: [email protected] > Allmandring 30a Tel: ++49-711-68565868 > 70569 Stuttgart (Germany) WWW: http://www.tik.uni-stuttgart.de/ > REF:<[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
