On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Simon Schubert wrote: > On 03.09.2005, at 21:07, Carl A. Schmidt wrote: > >I have started with one simple change from MAKE_KERBEROS5 to > >NO_KERBEROS, > >making the option consistent with most of the other options. This > >changes the logic of the Makefiles where MAKE_KERBEROS5 appeared to on > >by default, but I also adjusted etc/defaults/make.conf to have > >NO_KERBEROS by default. I don't know if that's the correct way to go > >about disabling things by default or not, but it seemed to make sense. > > Thanks for your submission, but it won't work this way. if NO_KERBEROS > is defined in /etc/defaults/make.conf, then you won't be able to > undefine it lateron. While it would be good to have only one way of > logic, this unfortunately doesn't work how you'd like it. > > >Also, what's the preference as far as patches go? Is it preferred to > >have one big patch or multiple small patches? I suck at CVS so all I > >could put together right now was small patches for each file modified, > >and I expect this isn't what's preferred... > > Usually one big patch per changeset. cvs diff -u gives you the changes > that you made before. > > If possible, please send patches with Content-Disposition: inline. > > cheers > simon
Hrm, okay. Well thanks for the response, I'll just have to try a bit harder is all. -- Carl Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
