On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:06:31PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :I want to see at least a basic measurements first. This is very likely > :to increase both the runtime and memory foot print of programs and the > :argument "OpenBSD did it" is not a good justification for both. > : > :Joerg > > Well, you are welcome to make such measurements but I don't see anything > in the patch that would increase memory footprints, since the old code > was sbrk()ing memory in multiples of PAGE_SIZE and the new code > effectively does the same thing, just with mmap() instead of sbrk().
You mean like the guard pages? Joerg
