:Now that I think about it, our msleep() is misnamed --- it should have
:been called ssleep().  There's no "m" about it.  Any objections to changing it?
:
:                                                               Jeffrey

    If we're gonna start throwing around different types of sleeps maybe
    we should make the names more verbose. spin_sleep(), lockmgr_sleep(),
    etc.  We don't use them so often that they'll clutter up the code and
    the longer names will make the code more readable.

                                        -Matt
                                        Matthew Dillon 
                                        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to