Issue #3126 has been updated by sepherosa.
network stack :)
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:40 PM,
<bugtracker-ad...@leaf.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
> Issue #3126 has been updated by tuxillo.
>
> File bpf_biocfeedback.patch added
>
> Attached the patch with the corrections. By the way, who frees the mc mbuf
> which is passed to ifp->if_input ?
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Submit #3126: Bring in BIOC{S,G}FEEDBACK
> http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3126#change-13413
>
> * Author: tuxillo
> * Status: In Progress
> * Priority: Normal
> * Assignee: tuxillo
> * Category: net
> * Target version:
> ----------------------------------------
> Hi,
>
> The port net/vde2 uses a ioctl command BIOCFEEDBACK for FreeBSD to allow
> host-guest communication in a vde switch. The attached patch is the initial
> attempt to bring that ioctl command from NetBSD.
> It compiles but it's untested until I figure out how to test it.
>
> I'd need some pointers though:
>
> - Is it okay to use directly ifp->if_input directly? Isn't there a mechanism
> similar to the one used in bpfwrite() -> bpf_output_dispatch but for input?
> - If it's okay to use ifp->if_input directly, wouldn't it need some locking?
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio Huete
>
> ---Files--------------------------------
> bpf_biocfeedback.patch (3.37 KB)
>
>
> --
> You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it,
> or are involved in it.
> To change your notification preferences, please click here:
> http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
--
Tomorrow Will Never Die
----------------------------------------
Submit #3126: Bring in BIOC{S,G}FEEDBACK
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3126#change-13414
* Author: tuxillo
* Status: In Progress
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: tuxillo
* Category: net
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Hi,
The port net/vde2 uses a ioctl command BIOCFEEDBACK for FreeBSD to allow
host-guest communication in a vde switch. The attached patch is the initial
attempt to bring that ioctl command from NetBSD.
It compiles but it's untested until I figure out how to test it.
I'd need some pointers though:
- Is it okay to use directly ifp->if_input directly? Isn't there a mechanism
similar to the one used in bpfwrite() -> bpf_output_dispatch but for input?
- If it's okay to use ifp->if_input directly, wouldn't it need some locking?
Cheers,
Antonio Huete
---Files--------------------------------
bpf_biocfeedback.patch (3.37 KB)
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it,
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here:
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
