On 15 January, 2014 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 13:59 +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > > On 15 January 2014 10:30, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I had problems with this one on Qt5. > > > > > > > this seems like a big change. could you elaborate why it was needed exactly? > > i think it would be preferable that we don't use stdbool for > > consistency with the C code. > > for example, things like process_dives() are C backend calls. > > I'll let Thiago speak on this with more authority, but it was my > understanding that true/false and TRUE/FALSE are intended to be > compatible... >
Something with Qt5 broke our bool-defines in dive.h, so i thought that the sane thing to do was to whack our hole c++ code into using true/false. We use -std=gnu99 so we should be able to use true/false everywhere. //Anton -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
