Hey guys, I managed to download the dives to diving log 5.0 and from there upload to en.divelogs.de then download to subsurface. :)
Jef Driesen <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2014-01-28 16:11, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> I wonder... Didn't the header length change? If he now has the new >> firmware with the longer header, will the old dives be downloaded with >> the new or the old header? >> >> That could cause parsing errors... > >Yes, there are two variants with a different length, but there is a >version number embedded in the header to figure out the correct length. >but the header looks correct to me. I didn't notice any problem there. >The problem is in the profile data. When parsing the section with the >sample divisors, the corresponding sample lengths are all wrong. For >example a temperature sample is supposed to be 2 byte long, but the >length stored in the data is 3 bytes. The libdivecomputer parser fails >there already, but if modify the code to accept 3 bytes, it just fails >at some later stage. > >The fact that the ostc itself also has problems displaying these dives, >is for me a strong indication that there is a problem with the data >rather than the parser. > >Jef _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
