On 10 Feb 2014, at 16:28, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
HI everyone, > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:07 +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> On 9 February 2014 02:48, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> EVERYONE please at least read and >>> comment in email - or just edit on the wiki. >> >> for the GSoC task "VPM-B/BE" >> >> here is a VPM-B in C and python: >> https://github.com/bwaite/vpmb > > IIRC that was a FORTRAN to C conversion and quite unusable… I had a quick look at it and it looks surprisingly good. It seems it is independent of the old FORTRAN code and in the doc folder there is even a LaTeX document with pseudo code that looks much better than Baker’s original text (as far as I can tell from only printing rather than reading it). > >> the source code license looks to me like the 2-clause (simplified) >> BSD, which is GPL2 compatible: >> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#FreeBSD >> >> it does have the: >> 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation >> and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > > Hate that license. The exif code I included also comes with that license. Do we have to do anything about this? I will read it and then comment more. Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
