Are you running our official binaries? That's all I need to know. /D
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 11:42 -0430, Erick Mezzoni wrote: > Ok. How can I run that process? I'm runnun win 7 ultimate 64bit > > El 11/02/2014 11:14, "Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected]> escribió: > > if you run > > subsurface --version > > it will give you a detailed version printout that tells us > exactly what > you are running. That way it's easier to make sure there isn't > a bug > triggering binary download by mistake. > > Also, which OS are you on? > > /D > > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 11:12 -0430, Erick Mezzoni wrote: > > Which output you mean? > > > > El 11/02/2014 11:10, "Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected]> > escribió: > > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 16:05 +0100, Jef Driesen > wrote: > > > On 2014-02-11 15:45, Erick Mezzoni wrote: > > > > Hi again jef. I´ve donwload again and i´m > attaching 2 > > screen captures > > > > to > > > > show you what I´m clicking. > > > > I´m opening a new divelog this time to try > > > > > > This logfile is again identical to the previous > ones. > > Strange. I wonder > > > if the "save libdivecomputer dumpfile" option is > internally > > hooked up > > > incorrectly, such that it is always enabled, even > when the > > checkbox is > > > not checked. > > > > Always possible that something is broken. I haven't > noticed > > that, > > though. Erick, which version of Subsurface are you > using? Can > > you run > > subsurface --version and send us the output? > > > > /D > > > > _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
