On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn < cristian.ionescu-idbo...@axis.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > > On 17 March 2014 18:54, Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabr...@kde.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Anton Lundin <gla...@acc.umu.se> > wrote: > > >> On 16 March, 2014 - Anton Lundin wrote: > > >> > > >> I did some Qt5 fixes too, and ill probably send them out tonight. > > >> > > >> Dirk: What do you say about making Qt5 support "official", aka start > > >> testing patches against it? > > >> > > >> Marble supports Qt5 nowadays, and maybe we should start doing our > > >> releases based on Qt5? > > > > > > > > > If Marble supports it, I'm all for making this release the last one > > > requiring Qt4. :) > > > > is it well supported on older distros? > > i don't see packages for Ubuntu Lucid. > > qt5 didn't reach debian unstable yet. Noticed it's slowly making it's > way into debian experimental, but it will take some time (think > months), I guess, until it will hit unstable. > Qt5's been on the 'Stable' mark for about a year now ( on qt-project.org ). debian is a *very* pricky distribution... > > > Cheers, > > -- > Cristian > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > subsurface@hohndel.org > http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@hohndel.org http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface