On 18 March, 2014 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > On 18 March 2014 17:27, Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 18 March 2014 17:17, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 17:05 +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > >>> On 18 March 2014 16:40, Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > On 18 March 2014 16:14, Anton Lundin <gla...@acc.umu.se> wrote: > >>> >> I just played around with Qt5 a bit and noticed that the pp-graph lines > >>> >> are way to thick and the ruler line too. > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > see attached patch. is that a fix for the ruler line? > >>> > > >>> > >>> updated with the pp-graph lines. > >>> (had to figure out what the heck is 'pp' in the first place...) > >>> > >>> my rough guess is that the base classes for all those lines (polygons) > >>> in Qt5 uses different default QPen width values or there is some sort > >>> of scaling (which is worse). > >>> if this patch doesn't solve it, i have no idea; all looks good on Qt4. > >> > >> So does this change the visual result on Qt4? > > > > there is one problem, the zoomed in lines of both the ruler and the pp > > look massive. > > anton, could you test this change again and ack for dirk to apply. > > > > 0.0 should be hairline thickness for Qt5 as well... > > if not something is broken. > > > > bump, anton not sure you saw that. >
0.0 Looks better in both Qt5 and Qt4. -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@hohndel.org http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface