Hi, after returning from a 3 weeks diving trip(*) I only found one minor issue to report that I just added to the bug tracker:
https://trac.hohndel.org/ticket/521 Dive Stats: "Average" depth lower than "Minimum" depth In addition to the defect description: I wonder whether displaying a "Minimum depth" or an "Average Depth" is useful, at all, since all dives start and end usually at depth zero, and I don't see how e.g. another 5 minutes that one could or could not have spent at very shallow depths at the start of a dive would contribute useful information into an "average" calculation. IMHO, a completely different value would provide more useful information: Some figure on how long tissue compartments came close to their point of pressure gradient tolerance during the dive. That could give a better (still vague) indication on the overall DCS risks of a dive. And since Subsurface computes saturation models, already, such a figure should not be difficult to derive. Regards, Lutz Vieweg (*) I'm now spoilt for life with regards to Manta sightings. Two consecutive dives with > 10 Mantas present the whole time of the dive in Pulau Langkoi (south Komodo) leave little room for improvements. ;-) _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
