On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 01:13:35PM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > as far as i understood the implications on a quick read and since > their desired model is the current github model as a comparison, why > move from a closed source online service which provides free of charge > project hosting, given there are no license clashes - i.e. subsurface > will still remain GPL compliant? > > if subsurface applies a new ideology in the lines of "we will not use > a closed source online service", then subsurface should stop using > github as well. > > "The decision was engineering-driven, not business-driven" > if the above is true and unless they suddenly add some limitations for > a free project after the change, such as 10 max languages i don't see > the need to switch services.
Completely agree. Side node - git.hohndel.org is the main repository. I push to github mostly for historic reasons... so dropping github would be quite easy for me :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
