On 05 Jul 2014, at 14:01, Robert C. Helling <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> here are two patches conceding gas mixes in the planner:
> 
> The first removes the gasmix_is_null() test which used to test the “fo2=fhe=0 
> means use the last gas again” logic. I could not find a place where we 
> actually set the gasmix with that meaning but I found several where this 
> breaks gas handling with air (represented by the same values). 
> 
> So please test if this breaks anything!!! If it does, please use a different 
> out of band value to signal “same gas as before” not the same as air. I 
> propose to use fo2=-4711.
> 
> The second patch corrects the logic for choosing gas mixes when inserting 
> waypoints: A new waypoint subdivides a previous segment. So both new segments 
> should by default inherit the gas of the old segment. This patch implements 
> that (it used to be the gasmix of the segment preceding the old segment which 
> makes no sense at all. Note that the gasmix of a segment is determined by the 
> waypoint at the _end_ of the segment.


and now including the patches….

Attachment: 0001-Remove-gasmix_is_null.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 0002-When-adding-a-waypoint-use-the-gasmix-of-the-_next_-.patch
Description: Binary data


Best
Robert

--                                                                              
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO 
Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics  
                      Scientific Coordinator                                   
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik    
print "Just another   Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339       
    stupid .sig\n";   http://www.atdotde.de 

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to