Em 11/07/2014 10:05, "Lubomir I. Ivanov" <[email protected]> escreveu: > > On 11 July 2014 14:55, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 July, 2014 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > > > >> On 11 July 2014 10:13, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > glance> for (int i=0;i<3;i++) ? > >> > >> for that to work on older versions e.g. MSVC 2003, /Tp has to be used > >> (like jeff mentioned, we can mark the input to be C++) and then extern > >> "C" wrapping would be needed to preserve the binary interface. > >> > >> on even older versions like MSVC 1998, /Tp exists but the actual > >> intermix feature from c99 is a bit messed up. the lexical scanner does > >> recognize it, but then it assigns a non-local scope to the iterator. > >> so you can do things like: > >> > >> for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) > >> puts("stuff"); > >> i = 0; // <--- > >> > >> i would advice against this particular feature if targeting older > >> MSVC, but for third party source projects i usually follow their usage > >> of "for" loops. > >> for my own managed projects, this: > >> > >> int i = 0; > >> while (i < ...) {... i++ } > >> > >> remained as a habit. > >> > > > > Msvc 2013 seems to get it right, and i can gladly argue that we > > shouldn't support any older Msvc's just for the sake of it. > > > > How many do actually build subsurface for windows? You, Dirk and maybe 1 > > 2 other dev's, but thats probably it. Dirk uses mingw, and you would > > know to use msvc 2013, so it doesn't feel like a show stopper for me =) > > > > But, if we as always, if we know that things break with older msvc's we > > should document it. > > > > well, my opinion is that mingw is sufficient of a complier for windows > and in the case of subsurface. > MSVC support would be a time consuming exercise with no real benefits.
Msvc generates faster executables on win32 than gcc, this is a benefit. I'll be changing some macros today to see if it breaks anything. Tomaz > lubomir > -- > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
