On 17.07.2014, at 09:04, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: I traced this down to commit 887f9e63c3705df52b802420e72f5854d75c8ca6 Maybe more brain power (due to 5h of sleep) but unfortunately 0 spare time: I think, it’s the defaults that are wrong due to a unit confusion: We display the rates in meter or feet per minute but we store them in units of mm/sec. So the defaults should be in those units as well. Here is a patch. Best Robert |
0001-Ascent-descent-rates-are-stored-in-mm-s-not-in-m-min.patch
Description: Binary data
-- .oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO Robert C. Helling Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Scientific Coordinator Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik Phone: +49 89 2180-4523 Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339 http://www.atdotde.de Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515 BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D and DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D 5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F |
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
