On 05.08.2014, at 12:10, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

What shall we do about this?

1) Nothing. We consider it a user error.
2) Not allow setting GFhigh to values below 35% if “last stop at 6m” is selected (GFhigh=1% still allows to surface with the saturation at 3m, so the problem is only with decoing at 6m). In fact, I don’t think values below 50% are reasonable anyway.
3) Always ascent after 48h of deco (the Buehlmann model is not supposed to be extrapolated to such long times anyway)
4) Always ascent to 3m after 48h of deco (which then eventually brings us to the surface as argued above)
5) Do 3) or 4) with a statement in the notes that this is what happened (new translatable string, hurray!)
6) Throw an error message and refuse to plan deco (again a new string).


Hi,

here is a patch that implements option 5) above.

Best
Robert

Attachment: 0001-Bail-out-of-deco-calculation-after-48h-or-dive-time.patch
Description: Binary data



-- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO
Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
                      Scientific Coordinator
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik
                      Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339
                      http://www.atdotde.de

Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints
A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515  BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D    and
DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D  5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to