On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Miika Turkia <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:23:51AM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: >> > Em 20/08/2014 06:39, "Benjamin" <[email protected]> escreveu: >> > > >> > > This may be flogging a dead horse, but maybe instead of just changing >> the >> > icon layout, would it help if the user could also select which icons >> should >> > be shown? Is it possible to do the equivalent of "visible = false" to >> the >> > icons, based on a user setting, without causing huge problems in either >> the >> > UI, or the functionality? Or would it simply lead to far too many user >> > problems? >> > >> > I think it would, but im no designer. Ill attack a designer to see what >> > they think about it. >> >> I like your idea, Tomaz, of simply re-layouting things into two column >> when the vertical space gets constraint MUCH better than an option to >> disable and hide some of the buttons. >> > > How about similar enable-disable selection than what is already used for > the columns on divelist? Many of the icons are useless for the average > recreational diver, so it would not hurt to hide these by default. > not going to happen. The dive list have this because it's so big and there's no other way to display the items in a sane way, and this one we can. The recreational diver can not understand most of the buttons but as soon as he clicks something will happen and he will see some differences ( for instance, the tissues ) and this is a nice point to have. :) > miika >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
