On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > > You and me both. It's scary to be maintaining a project with 60+% of its > > users running on Windows and at the same time having NO CLUE about > > Windows... :') > I wonder when this will be a major issue: having most developers on one > platform and most users on another. At my previous workplace we had 1 guy > only > on windows, and then he switched and then we had nobody checking what our own > product looked like on windows.
I constantly build it for Windows and we have about half a dozen of our really active testing-contributors on Windows. So I think we are in reasonably good shape there. > > I'd say it's sufficient and given the memory use overall it makes no > > difference. > Yeah that's true, I am just a bit wary of big stack allocations. > > > Is there a reason you can't use something like 4096? I have no experience > > with Hurd, either, so I'm not sure if there is a reason that would be a > > bad idea. > Nope on Hurd any value works fine, they don't have any hardcoded limit, so > for > them even 20MiB is ok. But I suppose filesystems have limits. > > > In my mind anyone who uses a file path with more than 2000 characters gets > > what they deserve... > I sent a patch where it's set to 260, feel free to add one more digit then! Yeah, as Thiago said in his comment... 4096 seems more reasonable to me. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
