In that case it is good to go. Working off trips is probably a decent solution. Great. On 10 Dec 2014 23:21, "Dirk Hohndel" <d...@hohndel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:15:54PM +0000, Long, Martin wrote: > > I think I'm starting to be the 'annoying neighbour' :-) > > Not at all - we love adding new active contributors. > > > So, the last patch adds proper trip support in the UDDF export, rather > > than hijacking the repetition group. > > > > With this done I'm wondering if there is a better way we can use the > > repetition group. I'm looking for a bit of input for this, as with > > only 31 dives myself (and 1 year diving), I'm not really 100% sure on > > the ins and outs of repetition groups. > > > > I would probably go with just 1 repetition group per day (or date), > > though I could see perhaps someone doing night dives, or 4 dives a day > > on a liveaboard might consider a repetition group spanning more than > > one day. At the same time, the way it currently works, a 1 week trip > > doing 2 dives a day, probably shouldn't be considered a repetition > > group. > > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on this? > > Depending on the degree of slow tissue loading it can take quite a while > before you are completely desaturated. We currently assume inside > Subsurface that after 48h you are desaturated and no longer do the deco > calculation. So for consistency we should group any set of dives that > doesn't have a 48h gap in between. > > So yes, in my mind, even if you do just one dive a day on consecutive > days, it's still a repetition group. > > /D >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface