On Monday 12 January 2015 13:42:04 Paul-Erik Törrönen wrote:
> > Hmm...
> > Well, first of all, a binary called "qmake-qt5" is non-standard and not
> > supported by the Qt Project. The correct way to run qmake is just "qmake",
> > or
>
> > wrapped by qtchooser:
> Well this is nitpicking, but the name is totally irrelevant. The apparent
> fact is that it is the location that matters to the binary. The packager
> who created the Fedora package of the qt5-qcore-devel (from which both
> binaries come) did not understand/was unaware of this.
Actually, no, it's not nitpicking. If you were following the standard and
supported way, qtchooser would have run the right binary for you and it would
have worked.
> If Fedora/Redhat requires that there should be a /usr/bin/qmake-qt5, then
> this should not have been the identical binary, rather a shell-script
> which circumvents the issue by internally calling the correct qmake. Then
> the binary would have gotten the correct path looking at dirname( ARGV[0]
> ).
There is such a thing, except it's not a shell script.
> But anyway, I initially informed Fedora-people of this with a message to
> fedora-users email-list, and got a reply to create an issue, which I am
> currently in process of doing.
You'll need to try the qtchooser way too.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
