> I don't really see the "overkill" argument, since the switch doesn't introduce any significant amount of more code/config? Well, it is overkill in the sense that I am, to my knowledge, the only one to maintain the companion. And I was too lazy to install IntelliJ on my workstation :). As everyone seems to want the switch, I'll do it. Trying IntelliJ was on my TODO list anyways (even if I hate gradle / groovy).
> I'm thinking something down the line of exporting the companion data as gpx/kml/whatnot We already do GPX import. Adding GPX export would indeed make sense. And it would allow the companion to add the additional fields which are not supported in the web service. BTW, is there a GPX import in current desktop subsurface (I actually never ever installed nor launched it) ? If yes, is the "wpt/desc" field used ? Or should I use another for additional fields ? I'll try to do the changes in the next few weeks. > Sorry for bothering guys. See you on Trac No problem, any advice welcome. Aurélien 2015-01-13 12:28 GMT+01:00 Davide DB <[email protected]>: > Sorry for bothering guys. See you on Trac > > -- > Davide > https://vimeo.com/bocio/videos > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
