On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:11:25PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote: > On 06 January, 2015 - Anton Lundin wrote: > > > This triggers the rest of the code to treat the sensor value as our > > ppO2 value. > > > > This one never got applied. Should i change the code into using setpoint > member for ppo2, or would you like to take this one?
Sorry - I had asked a question about it and then never applied it. It's in my tree now. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
