OK, Now everything is clear to me. Reverse geocoding or other tricks are just helpers to populate and mantain this location database.
What is the common opinion about this? On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Davide DB <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Right now in the XML every location is threated as different >> regardless being the same. I think that a proper solution will involve >> moving location to a common part into the xml. > > > And *this* is the heart of my issue. I want to avoid duplication of dive > site data (on disk and in memory), with all the hassle that brings. > > Everything else is icing on the cake. The UI could be solved multiple > ways. > > My earlier talk about dropdowns and taxonomy really was just suggestions of > how the UI *could* look like, but I realized this has confused you and Dirk. > > Henrik > -- Davide https://vimeo.com/bocio/videos _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
