On 22. 02. 15 17:52, Miika Turkia wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Patrick Valsecchi <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 02/03/2015 04:41 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
Hi,
This is a tentative to make subsurface a bit more flexible
when parsing GPS
coordinates. I like to geo-reference my dives, but copy
and pasting the
coordinates from web sites was quite a pain (needed a lot
of manual
correction).
Please have a look and comment. I'm quite tempted to go
wild and do another
rewrite without using regular expressions... would be more
flexible and less
code, IMHO.
Absolutely. By all means, please rewrite it without regular
expression if
that makes it more flexible.
Given where we are in the testing cycle, I won't apply this
fix to master.
I'm hoping to cut 4.4 in the next day or two and there's no
way this will
get enough testing.
OK, here is a total rewrite of the GPS coordinates parsing
including UTs.
It is a lot more flexible on the format and supports all the
formats of the previous parser (AFAIK).
I share your opinion on not including it in 4.4.
Do you care to work on the GPS parsing a bit more? We have some
requests for more lax parsing on our user forum:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/subsurface-divelog/pMPlpNvhmfw
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21category-topic/subsurface-divelog/pMPlpNvhmfw>
E.g. 48 51.491n 2 17.677e
No problem. I'll come up with a patch in the next days.
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
