Salva, On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:26:32PM +0100, Salvador Cuñat wrote: > > > > And now, five months later, it seems I still never applied it. > > > > Any idea why? > > > > /D > > > I don't know. I thought you didn't like that hackish code pages related > thing (I recon I dislike very much).
I'm not in love with it, but it's one file that serves a very specific purpose. I cleaned it up a tiny bit but left it mostly unchanged... and pushed it so I wouldn't forget again :-) > Don't worry, if you think it may be interesting, I have an improved version > wich relays on libdivecomputer to parse the dive samples. Just would need > some time to align it with latest master. So a slight variation of what you have is now in master. I made sure it works with the new divesite infrastructure and dealt with a few other issues. If you could send any patches relative to that, I'd appreciate it. > BTW, as commented with Davide in this thread, I've been working a bit in a > parser for SmartTrak's JET based files, also libdc based, and it's pretty > functional. But this work has a *big* drawback, it introduces a new > dependency for mdbtools, which in turn depends on libglib2 , so it would > need to add two new dependencies. glib2? hmm access db support? Double hmm I'm wondering, would it be possible / easier to have a standalone converter? How common are these files? How many users will come to Subsurface and need support for this? > As said, if you think it can be interesting, just give me a little time and > I can send a patch. No worries. I waited 5 months. Who am I to rush you? :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
