On 2 April 2015 at 19:54, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: > I don’t have a strong opinion on weather we should do the safety stop also > in the trail ascent. If we did, the NDL would be longer but on the other > hand this would make the safety stop mandatory. What do you people think? >
If I'm interpreting you correctly, a mandatory safety stop isn't a safety stop so much as 3 minutes of planned deco. This is beyond the limits of recreational (no stop) diving. It's worth noting that dive tables and many recreational dive computers do not use gradient factors or other ways of adding conservatism. Some users may want to run 100/100 gradient factor for recreational dive planning to be close to the tables used in courses, or a basic dive computer planner. The conservatism comes from adding in a safety stop, and ascending several minutes before the NDL reaches zero. I'm not suggesting another check box for automatically using 100/100 GF on recreational dive planning, but perhaps it's something that could be mentioned in the manual or FAQ - "How come the Subsurface recreational dive planner is so much more conservative than my dive tables?" R > Best > Robert > > -- > .oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO > Robert C. Helling Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical > Physics > Scientific Coordinator > Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik > Phone: +49 89 2180-4523 Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339 > http://www.atdotde.de > > Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints > A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515 BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D and > DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D 5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface > _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
