On 09 Apr 2015, at 18:49, Joakim Bygdell <[email protected]> wrote:
Jocke,
> Patch-3: Since we use bottom sac when we calculate the gas used in the ascent
> we should ignore the deco sac or the dive plan details will differ from the
> displayed profile.
good catch. But I would resolve it the other way around (as I had planned to do
but failed): I intended to just the bottom SAC for the time still spent at
depth while using the deco SAC for the actual ascent (and the safety stop). If
the user wanted it differently, she could set the deco SAC to bottom SAC.
Best
Robert
--
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO
Robert C. Helling Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Scientific Coordinator
Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik
print "Just another Phone: +49 89 2180-4523 Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339
stupid .sig\n"; http://www.atdotde.de
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
