Hi! If as Dirk said, you guys want to have a constant access to my work and relatively often merge it with master, I need to change my approach a little bit (I wanted to first implement the algorithm, independent from the rest of the source, then integrate it). Maybe it's a good idea to keep it integrated all the time. But it leads to some questions about how this new algorithm should work with the current deco implementation:
The most important thing is if we want both algorithms to be calculated for the current dive and just one of them displayed or should we recalculate the plan depending on the chosen algorithm? Should I put the new algorithm into current deco. files or should I look for some way to split them? Right now, there is a lot of things in deco which I need in vpmb implementation. Right now, planner has an ugly plan() function which among others implements the main logic of the current deco algorithm. Can I add plan_buehlmann and plan_vpmb() which will be called from the current plan() function? Thanks, Jan Darowski _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
