Asking might actually be a nice idea. That way people can decide what fudge factor they want for each set of dives.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:20 Joakim Bygdell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 10 Jun 2015, at 17:52, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:49:35PM +0000, Benjamin wrote: > >> Maybe if the dives are withing something smaller than 5 metres then > merge > >> them? > > > > Yes, even < 10m seems like obviously the same spot. > > 50m is more questionable in my mind. > > > > what do others think? > > > > /D > > I can see a problem emerging if we are that narrow in the distance > differential when merging sites. > > Wreck diving, depending on wind and surface currents the location of the > dive boat might easily differ 50m or so even if the target for the dive is > the same. > So two divers diving the same wreck on subsequent days will then get > different locations for the same dive site. > > Or should we notify the user that there exists a site within our extended > (50m radius) distance and ask if it is the same? > > /Jocke > >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
