On 06/21/2015 03:23 PM, Rick Walsh wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015 8:16 am, "Steve Butler" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> On 06/20/2015 06:25 PM, Rick Walsh wrote:On 21 Jun 2015 11:19 am,
"Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:17:28AM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
>> > > But what about me? I like SI units and whole decimals. Don't
worry, 2 s
>> > > timesteps fit nicely when using 10 m/s ascent rate (18 s
between stops).
snip
> Also my DC records every 10s. One of the DCs i'm looking at does 5s
intervals.
>
> How would this work comparing the pre-dive plan with the post-dive
profile?
>
The change has nothing to do with setting or limiting an ascent rate.
Currently the ascent to the next stop is done in 3 second increments.
If you ascend at 30ft/min (Subsurface default, which matches most DCs)
it should take 20s to ascend 10ft. But in 3s increments it is bumped
out to 21s. No huge issue but it makes the calculated plan have some
odd runtimes.
So that would be 10 calculations (one every 2s) between stops. If you
slid the other way and went every 4s then its 5 calculations up to the
next stop. Any concerns with snappiness (performance) on slower machines?
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
