On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:10:17PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote: > Talking to myself.... > > On 23 June 2015 at 21:47, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I *think* the offending change is within the huge stack of conditional > > statements in lines 644-680. I believe I have got my head around it and > > will send a patch tonight my time. > > > > > The problem was that gaschange_after was set true at the first gaschange, > then never got set false. That messed with some logic. I sent sent a very > simple patch that fixes it.
That patch is awesome. I looked at it and said "but that's the same condition!". It really took me 5 seconds (and the commit message) to figure out why it makes a huge difference. Good catch, Rick! /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
