On 26-06-15 18:36, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 07:00:37PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
I believe this is a good direction. From the discussion earlier I'm
doubtful that Jef agrees, but maybe a successful implementation can sway
him :-)
It would be good if he will give us some feedback.
Jef is very busy and has a long list of issues he is trying to stay on top
of. That said, Yes, I'd love to get his input here. Even if it is along
the lines of "how to make this least annoying to him".
Sorry for the lack of response. I didn't disappear, but for the past few weeks
I've been too busy with real life. I'll provide my feedback, but I won't have
time for that before Monday. So have a little more patience.
BTW, I'm not necessary saying "no" to the idea of supporting a custom I/O
implementation in libdivecomputer. But I do have some concerns here and there,
which I wanted to discuss (see one of the previous threads).
Jef
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
