> On 04 Jul 2015, at 16:46, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5 July 2015 at 00:30, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > Could someone with access to different dive planning software please run a > few test plans for me? > > Let's do the profile that Rick quoted from the VPM documentation: > > three gases: 15/45, 36%, 100% > descent rate to bottom of 75ft/min down to 260ft (weird... 208 seconds to the > bottom...) > 30 minutes bottom time (we can't do that it seems, drop down to bottom is > included in the first segment... so let's say 33 minutes until end of bottom > time) > ascent rate 30ft/min > 10ft/min from the final stop (actually, Subsurface can't do that, so 10ft/min > from 20ft which will add a tiny 40 seconds from 20ft to 10ft) > > Here is the full VPM Fortran (without Boyle's law correction) benchmark I > mentioned, including transitions: > duration runtime end depth (ft) > 3.5 3.5 260 > 26.5 30 260 > 2.7 32.7 180 > 0.7 34 170 > 0.7 35 160 > 1.7 37 150 > 1.7 39 140 > 1.7 41 130 > 2.7 44 120 > 1.7 46 110 > 0.7 47 100 > 1.7 49 90 > 1.7 51 80 > 2.7 54 70 > 3.7 58 60 > 4.7 63 50 > 5.7 69 40 > 7.7 77 30 > 21.7 99 20 > 2 101 0
MultiDeco, VPM-B, descent speed 75ft/min, ascent speed 30ft/min surfacing speed 10ft/min. Duration Runtime Depth Diff vs reference 3 3 260 -0.5 26 30 260 0 5 33 180 +0.3 1 34 170 0 1 35 160 0 1 36 150 -1 2 38 140 -1 2 40 130 -1 2 42 120 -2 2 44 110 -2 1 45 100 -2 2 47 90 -2 3 50 80 -1 3 53 70 -1 5 58 60 0 5 63 50 0 9 72 40 +3 11 83 30 +6 34 117 20 +18 2 119 0 +18 /Jocke _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
