On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 06:36:58AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > I seem to get 107 with the latest build. 9/9/9/3 m/min for ascent. > GF 100/100 > last stop at 6 > drop down to depth and 30 minutes at 79m > 0 min minimum switch duration > > depth duration runtime gas > 79m 3min 3min (15/45) > 79m 27min 30min > 33m 5min 35min EAN38
Grr, did EAN38 again. Stupid fingers. imperial with 30/30/30/10/75 ft/min GF 100/100 last stop at 20 0 min min switch depth duration runtime gas 260ft 3min 3min (15/45) 260ft 27min 30min 110ft 6min 36min EAN36 90ft 2min 37min 80ft 2min 39min 70ft 3min 42min 60ft 4min 46min 50ft 6min 52min 40ft 8min 60min 30ft 13min 73min 20ft 35min 108min oxygen 0ft 2min 110min CNS: 109% OTU: 164 and then this is with 9/9/9/3/23 m/min GF 100/100 last stop at 6m 0 min min depth duration runtime gas 79m 3min 3min (15/45) 79m 27min 30min 33m 5min 35min EAN36 27m 2min 37min 24m 2min 39min 21m 3min 42min 18m 4min 46min 15m 5min 51min 12m 8min 59min 9m 12min 71min 6m 35min 106min oxygen 0m 2min 108min CNS: 109% OTU: 162 I think this might need a little bit more work to understand what causes the tiny fluctuations from the UI. My bet is that if we save those dives and look at the exact times for the different samples we'll see the small changes as the UI possibly shows rounded values somewhere... /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
