On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > And like it or not, our preferences do matter a bit > here.
Absolutely unnecessary statement. I'm not trying to impose my view but just contributing with my view for the sake of a better application. >> BRANCH #FIVE >> >> 1. empty location field >> 1.2. GPS data (e.g. from Subsurface web service - dive site with no name) >> 1.2.1. user types in name, picks one of the completions >> 1.2.1.1 completion has GPS data >> 1.2.1.1.2 completion GPS is different from the incoming GPS data >> >> Hummmm >> This one? > I did notice that in all the cases above you forgot about the a)/b) > (accept/reject). In most cases that's kinda obvious (just discard). > And I think even in the cases where this would have created a new dive > site we just discard it. > > For now I think the simplest logic would be to assume that all changes > made go away and we are exactly in the same state as before this edit > operation started. This was my intention. For the sake of simplicity -- Davide https://vimeo.com/bocio/videos _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
