On 15 Jul 2015 21:31, "Linus Torvalds" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So do I. About the same percentages as well. Of course I would like to find > > existing dive sites autocompleted. I'm talking about creating new sites, > > not the obvious use case of re-using old ones. > > But I want *new* GPS information. > > So for me, it's a new divesite. > > Really. > > Then, *afterwards*, I might manage the the dive sites and combine > things, but that's not what happens by default, and that's not what > happens when I edit the dive sites of the day.
Then we should change the way updating gps positions work, instead of creating explicit workarounds for (what I guess is) a very small subset of users. > Now I'm really done. This slipped through because the subject changed. That was the intention. Henrik
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
