On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:33:02PM +0300, Miika Turkia wrote: > Sometimes MKVI records sample time erroneously and we have to "fix" the > time. The 2 samples (from single DC) I have seen suffering this issue > can be corrected by subtracting 65528 from the sample time. > > Fixes #916 > > Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <[email protected]> > --- > file.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/file.c b/file.c > index 8522b2e..5afc91c 100644 > --- a/file.c > +++ b/file.c > @@ -651,7 +651,14 @@ int parse_txt_file(const char *filename, const char *csv) > has_setpoint = false; > has_ndl = false; > sample = prepare_sample(dc); > - sample->time.seconds = cur_sampletime; > + > + /* > + * Sometimes MKVI records sample time erroneously and > we have to "fix" the > + * time. The 2 samples (from single DC) I have seen > suffering this issue can > + * be corrected by subtracting 65528 from the sample > time. > + */ > + > + sample->time.seconds = cur_sampletime > 65000 ? > cur_sampletime - 65528 : cur_sampletime;
This looks so totally random to me... what happens when you consider these as signed numbers. Do they make any sense then? So is the the MKVI somehow recording a negative delta to signify "something"? /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
