Hi,
> Am 30.08.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Rick Walsh <[email protected]>: > > This approach gets rid of "blips" in the calculated ceiling due to a step in > Boyle's law compensation during ascent. In limited testing, it also appears > to > avoid creating a ceiling deeper than the calculated plan in most cases. I also looked at this today. After spending some time with Mathematica I came to the conclusion that there is no dimple analytical formula for the ceiling in vpm-b. But I have an idea for a simple iterative solution which will simplify the whole business of the Boyle compensation. I might still do this but for the time being this is s pragmatic solution to the problem Gaetan pointed out. Best Robert _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
