On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:26:42PM +0200, Guido Lerch wrote: > All good now. > > I looked into avoiding to read all the dive-spots but this is not possible > unless the divespot was read in a current import > already. The reason on why we cannot compare already stored dives from the > xml is that we don't store the dive spot > id. I don't think we should implement this just for the uemis. > > What I am doing already is to avoid duplication of dive spots, and not > doing anything with dive-spots if the uemus dive-spot > id is -1. So Dirk, in your case not a single dive-spot is being read :-) > For me about 80. > > I keep on thinking however on how to make the import faster and allow > partial imports while I am on vacation :-) > > If someone is testing and finds an issue, please let me know.
So if I read this correctly you think that the current code is "good to go" for 4.5? I may make a couple of tiny adjustments here and there (let's call them "cleanup"), but nothing significant. I'm planning to release Beta 2 today. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
