On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 09:23:17AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday 20 September 2015 08:17:07 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:56:43PM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > > > On 20 September 2015 at 07:03, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:18:00PM +0930, Steve wrote: > > > >> Thanks Claudiu, these patches fixed the issue perfectly. Both HW OSTC > > > >> and SW Petrel devices worked well.> > > > > > Thanks for verifying! The patches made it to Beta 2, so hopefully we'll > > > > get some more testing. So far there appears to be only one person who > > > > has > > > > tested my Beta 2 binaries, though :-) > > > > > > > > One other thing I notice... I have not a single entry for "Windows 10" > > > > and > > > > looking at the code I don't think we have a correct test here. > > > > > > > > Thiago, can you help us out here? > > > > > > here is my quick attempt, > > > this assumes that Qt 5.5 has the means to find the Windows 10.0 > > > version at runtime. the WINAPI broke the standard GetVersion(Ex) for > > > versions >= 8.1, but i see that Qt handles that in qglobal.cpp. > > > > I'll try that. We'll see if the next daily detects Win10 correctly. > > That code shouldn't be enabled in Subsurface if you're building with Qt 5.5. > The information should come straight from QSysInfo.
:facepalm: I forgot to upgrade the build server for the Windows binaries to Qt5.5 :-( Grmbl. Doing that right now... there may be a Beta 3 quicker than expected. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
