On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:31:30AM +1100, Rick Walsh wrote: > On 6 Oct 2015 07:17, "Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:09:49PM +0200, Krzysztof Arentowicz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could someone give me an explanation how dive site geo lookup options > work? > > > > > > "Enable geocoding for dive site management" > > > "Parse site without GPS data" > > > "Same format for existing dives" > > > > > > I have no idea what they do and it makes translating somewhat difficult. > > > These options are not covered in user's manual. > > > > Yes, Willem struggles with the concepts as well. > > > > I am actually considering (yes, I know, crazy) to remove these options > > because they fundamentally seem redundant as they describe a feature that > > is not yet fully implemented. > > > > The first one ("Enable geocoding") should be selfexplanatory... it turns > > on support for geocoding. But frankly, why do we need this? It no longer > > happens automatically, the user has to trigger it per dive site. So the > > preference setting is redundant. > > > > And the other two ("Parse site without GPS data" and "Same format for > > existing dives") both refer to things that we didn't have anyone > > implementing (I ran out of time and energy). > > > > So my suggestion is that I simply comment out that preferences page and we > > always enable the geocoding option. > > > > Comments, thoughts? > > > What about geocode format? I think we need to keep that preference. > Country/State/Town works well in Australia, but I'm not sure how it would > work for countries without separate states.
Yes, that one needs to stay. I just want to drop the block above it. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
